MR Neurography
as a Useful Test in
Evaluating People
With CRPS
BY Robert L. Knobler, MD, PHD
MR Neurography is a new modification
of magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) that obtains unique images of
peripheral nerves within their surrounding
soft tissues. This important
advance in the assessment of injuries in
which peripheral nerves to the limbs
may be involved can be beneficial to
individuals suspected of having
CRPS. My experience with this
technique has been through the recent
availability of the Neurography Institute
protocol at Norristown, Pennsylvania. I
have reviewed the images on over 50
individuals, and have been impressed
with both the images and the reports I
received.
In the past, the phrase "soft tissue
injury" described problems affecting
connective tissues other than major tendons
and ligaments—muscles and
nerves that were not expected to resolve
over a period of four to six weeks after
injury. These injuries were not visible on
routine imaging studies such as X-rays,
CT scans or MRIs.
With MRI, it became possible to see
some soft tissue injuries, such as disc herniations,
ligament tears, tendon ruptures,
and even swelling within muscles
because of unique signal characteristics
of the tissues at the location of the nerve
root as it left the spinal canal. However,
once a nerve was on its course within
the tissues of a limb, where partial injury
could give rise to CRPS Type I (RSD) or
type II (causalgia), it was no longer as
visible, because of the similar signal
characteristics of the nerve to its surrounding
tissues in the limb.
MR Neurography was first used in November 1992. The first patient
images using MR Neurography identified
the pattern of fibers within the
nerve that previously could only be
observed by direct examination. This
image helped prove that the structure
studied was truly a nerve. The image was
published in the Lancet in 1993 and
received a great deal of attention.
Physicians most frequently order MR
Neurography studies for pain in the
arms, hands, legs and feet. This pain
often is caused by problems at the level
of the spine, such as herniated disc or a
bony spur, which leads to "pinched
nerve" type problems. When there is
persistent, severe pain down the arm or
leg, a physician will commonly order a
CT scan or MRI of the spine. If the
spine imaging studies show no abnormalities,
attention will be shifted to
other places, such as the nerves outside
the spine.
MR Neurography, unfortunately, is
not yet widely available for several reasons.
First, this technique is quite
demanding on the MRI machine, and
only units with a very powerful magnet
can provide the needed images. Second,
most radiologists are not trained or
experienced at reading images of nerves.
This is a critical factor that influences
the interpretation of the information
that is obtained.
MR Neurography examinations use
equipment and software which is FDA approved. Numerous insurers, including many HMOs, indemnity carriers, workers’
compensation boards, Medicare, and
other entities have reviewed the use of
these studies and have not denied any
approvals if the performance of the
imaging study itself is indicated. The
CPT codes currently used for these studies
are routine soft tissue MRI codes.
MR Neurography can be used in the
diagnostic evaluation of any condition
thought to be due to nerve compression
or impingement, trauma involving
peripheral nerves, repetitive strain
injuries, and congenital or obstetrical
abnormalities. In addition to peripheral
nerve conditions such as carpal tunnel
syndrome, ulnar nerve compression,
thoracic outlet syndrome (including
brachial plexus traction injuries), and
nerve tumors, these studies are used to
evaluate spine problems, such as a suspected
radiculopathy, when routine
studies fail to demonstrate the cause of
the pathology. MR Neurography may
also be useful in documenting an area
of entrapment of a peripheral nerve
causing partial injury to it, and resulting
in either RSD or causalgia.
Robert L Knobler, MD, PhD, Knobler
Institute of Neurologic Disease, PC
Fort Washington, Pennsylvania
RSDSA Review. Fall 2005.
Added April 7, 2009.
|